Many teachers
throughout the years have believed that students have different learning
styles, such as visual, verbal, and hands-on; therefore, teachers tend to focus
on one of those learning styles, because their class "must be" one
way or another. With this, teachers go overboard with only using one learning
style for their students, which limits students to the types of lessons that
are exposed to them, as well as limiting to their abilities. While it is true
that every student is "unique and has a different personality, experience,
and genes," the fact that teachers have to differentiate instruction to
better suit students' learning needs has "morphed into the belief that if
you match your style to their preference, it will lead to better grades,"
according to author Bradley Busch.
While students may have preferences to their learning,
authors Cedar Riener and Daniel Willingham, state that learning is the same no
matter if they are learning in their preferred way or not. Research on learning
preferences has failed to go deep enough to be able to prove whether or not
they 100% truly exist or not, which means that teachers should not limit
students on their abilities based on research that is not completely valid or
complete at all. This lack of evidence in research based on learning styles
proves that teachers should not jump to conclusions about students and learning
styles.
According to "Learning and the Adolescent Mind" found here,
there is not a definite answer as to whether or not intelligence can change,
meaning it is malleable, or if it is fixed. What is known is the learner
behavior that accompanies a mindset. If students believe their intelligence is
fixed and it is hard to learn new things, their motivation drops. If they
believe in flexibility and intellectual gain, they are more motivated!
The American Psychology Association states
that students who believed that their intelligence or ability to do school work
could change got better grades. They actually did better in school! The
students in this study were college age and were white as well as black (done
deliberately because there is also an unfortunate belief that some races and
genders are not as intelligent as others.) Once again the research shows that
it is possible to change a mindset and that it is beneficial.
Wired (http://www.wired.com/2015/01/need-know-learning-styles-myth-two-minutes/)
states that “…usually the most effective way for us to learn is based not on
our individual preferences but on the nature of the material we’re being taught…”
This article goes on to say that “there are so many different possible ways to
describe people’s preferred learning styles.” How can we just put
people’s learning styles in a cookie cutter- one size fits all format? Can
people really only be labeled a visual or kinesthetic learner?
Authors Philip Adey and Justin
Dillon state in their book, Bad Education: Debunking Myths in Education,
"[p]utting children into boxes that have not been proved to exist
may end up restricting the education they receive, leading teachers to overly
rigid views of individual pupils' potentialities, and what is worse, a new type
of stereotyping." This limitation for students is indeed a stereotype or
label that teachers place on their students. Blaming the student for their
"non-success" due to their learning style is unfair and not what
teachers should be doing. Instead, teachers need to work as hard as they can to
make students successful, whether it is evaluating their own teaching and
making the necessary changes, or encouraging students that they have the
ability to learn in any way. Learning styles are hurting children and teachers
are limiting their abilities; therefore, teachers need to ditch this way of
thinking, and remember that all children and students have the ability to learn
in multiple ways.
More:
This article also does a great job of summing this up!
More on learning styles!
Citations:
Adey, P., &
Dillon, J. (2012). Bad education: Debunking myths in education. New
York City: McGraw-Hill.
Busch, B.
(2016). Four neuromyths that are still prevalent in schools -- debunked; It's
not true that you only use 10% of your brain, not can you categorise students
by 'learning styles' -- let's cut this nonsense from classrooms. Guardian
Newspapers. Retrieved from
Riener, C.,
& Willingham, D. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change: The
Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 32-35. Retrieved from http://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/doi/full/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139
More:
This article also does a great job of summing this up!
More on learning styles!